Bottom line:  I have yet to discuss with my doctor, but my instinct is to stay off of statins (reducing the risk of CPT2 episodes) and continue with the Praluent.
Here is a brief summary of my results:
|  | 
Aug. 2014 | 
Dec. 2014 | 
Nov. 2015 | 
Feb. 2016 | 
|  | 
No statin, no Praluent | 
Livalo 2 mg | 
Praluent 75 mg, Livalo 2 mg | 
Praluent 150 mg, no statin | 
| 
LDL | 
198 | 
140 | 
77 | 
91 | 
| 
HDL | 
40 | 
47 | 
42 | 
53 | 
| 
VLDL | 
45 | 
24 | 
20 | 
21 | 
| 
Triglycerides | 
305 | 
150 | 
144 | 
182 | 
| 
AST | 
25 | 
31 | 
44 | 
25 | 
| 
ALT | 
60 | 
44 | 
64 | 
39 | 
| 
Creatine Kinase | 
173 | 
164 | 
192 | 
118 | 
Obviously, these tests are a snapshot in time.  It is also worth noting that between the November 2015 test and the February 2016 test, I relaxed my vigilance about consuming cholesterol, so I ate more foods with cholesterol.  However, it seems pretty clear that my liver (AST, ALT) and my CPT2 (Creatine Kinase) do much better without the statin (yes, I'm aware that a 192 CK is within the normal range, but it is worth noting that my "baseline" CK is lower in the Feb. 2016 than I ever remember seeing it in any test while on a statin).  My LDL went up by around 18% when dropping the statin and increasing the Praluent, and is still 35% lower than it was on the statin alone.  However, my HDL also went up -- by 26%, a good sign.
On the non-testable front, I feel better without taking the statin.  I've had fewer muscle incidents as well.  I haven't had any side effects from the Praluent except for slight bruising at the injection site the one time I injected it in the stomach area.  Although the instructions say you can do that, it really hurt and I won't be picking that area again.
