Bottom line: I have yet to discuss with my doctor, but my instinct is to stay off of statins (reducing the risk of CPT2 episodes) and continue with the Praluent.
Here is a brief summary of my results:
|
Aug. 2014
|
Dec. 2014
|
Nov. 2015
|
Feb. 2016
|
|
No statin, no Praluent
|
Livalo 2 mg
|
Praluent 75 mg, Livalo 2 mg
|
Praluent 150 mg, no statin
|
LDL
|
198
|
140
|
77
|
91
|
HDL
|
40
|
47
|
42
|
53
|
VLDL
|
45
|
24
|
20
|
21
|
Triglycerides
|
305
|
150
|
144
|
182
|
AST
|
25
|
31
|
44
|
25
|
ALT
|
60
|
44
|
64
|
39
|
Creatine Kinase
|
173
|
164
|
192
|
118
|
Obviously, these tests are a snapshot in time. It is also worth noting that between the November 2015 test and the February 2016 test, I relaxed my vigilance about consuming cholesterol, so I ate more foods with cholesterol. However, it seems pretty clear that my liver (AST, ALT) and my CPT2 (Creatine Kinase) do much better without the statin (yes, I'm aware that a 192 CK is within the normal range, but it is worth noting that my "baseline" CK is lower in the Feb. 2016 than I ever remember seeing it in any test while on a statin). My LDL went up by around 18% when dropping the statin and increasing the Praluent, and is still 35% lower than it was on the statin alone. However, my HDL also went up -- by 26%, a good sign.
On the non-testable front, I feel better without taking the statin. I've had fewer muscle incidents as well. I haven't had any side effects from the Praluent except for slight bruising at the injection site the one time I injected it in the stomach area. Although the instructions say you can do that, it really hurt and I won't be picking that area again.
No comments:
Post a Comment